Name: Ms Lydon, Leicester

Engineer Name: MD

Date: February 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

Martin worked non stop to get the boiler fitted in the day. He was genuinly a nice man, polite and answered all of my questions thoroughly. He is a credit to your company.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Thrall, Bilborough

Engineer Name: MD

Date: April 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

Both are a credit to the firm. Couldnt fault them.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Ms Glew, Wigston

Engineer Name: DN

Date: 22/7/15

Comments/Suggestions:

Brilliant - could not fault.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Liversidge, Nottingham

Engineer Name: MD

Date: March 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

He was excellent and he appeared to be training the young trainee very well.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Smith, Bramcote

Engineer Name: LK

Date: April 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

I would recommend your company.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Wallace, West Bridgford

Engineer Name: AW

Date: 15/7/15

Comments/Suggestions:

Excellent service. Neat job. Polite staff and engineer.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Everington, Gedling

Engineer Name: LC

Date: January 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

Excellent service will highly recommend company. Thank you.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Church of God, New Basford

Engineer Name: MD

Date: April 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mrs Johnson, Linby

Engineer Name: PR

Date: 27/4/15

Comments/Suggestions:

We were highly satisfied with the service received. The work was carried out professionally and within good time. Any mess was kept to a minimum. Price was competitive with the added advantage of a 12 year warranty. We would not hesitate to recommend the company.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mrs Spencer, Carlton

Engineer Name: CP

Date: December 2016

Comments/Suggestions:

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>