Name: Berry, Carlton, Nottingham

Engineer Name: MP

Date: April 2016

Comments/Suggestions:

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Miss Tidy, Shepshed

Engineer Name: Martyn Duke

Date: November 2016

Comments/Suggestions:

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mrs Smith, Gedling

Engineer Name: JH

Date: June 2016

Comments/Suggestions:

The engineer was punctual and friendly. He worked hard and completed his part of the installation on time. It was disappointing that the incorrect programmer had been ordered, delaying completion. However this mistake was corrected in a timely manner.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mrs Holyland, Leicester

Engineer Name: WJ

Date: April 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Ms Lydon, Leicester

Engineer Name: MD

Date: February 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

Martin worked non stop to get the boiler fitted in the day. He was genuinly a nice man, polite and answered all of my questions thoroughly. He is a credit to your company.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Thrall, Bilborough

Engineer Name: MD

Date: April 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

Both are a credit to the firm. Couldnt fault them.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Ms Glew, Wigston

Engineer Name: DN

Date: 22/7/15

Comments/Suggestions:

Brilliant - could not fault.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Liversidge, Nottingham

Engineer Name: MD

Date: March 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

He was excellent and he appeared to be training the young trainee very well.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Smith, Bramcote

Engineer Name: LK

Date: April 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

I would recommend your company.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Wallace, West Bridgford

Engineer Name: AW

Date: 15/7/15

Comments/Suggestions:

Excellent service. Neat job. Polite staff and engineer.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>