Name: Mrs Johnson, Linby

Engineer Name: PR

Date: 27/4/15

Comments/Suggestions:

We were highly satisfied with the service received. The work was carried out professionally and within good time. Any mess was kept to a minimum. Price was competitive with the added advantage of a 12 year warranty. We would not hesitate to recommend the company.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mrs Spencer, Carlton

Engineer Name: CP

Date: December 2016

Comments/Suggestions:

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Bosworth, Long Eaton

Engineer Name: LK

Date: April 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

We were very pleased by the service that we recieved. Both Lee and Michael were very kind and professional.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Jones, Leicestershire

Engineer Name: KJ

Date: March 2015

Comments/Suggestions:

Complete satisfaction. Thank you.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mrs Strange, West Bridgford

Engineer Name: MD

Date: November 2016

Comments/Suggestions:

It would have been helpful if the boiler fitter and electrician could have had an appointment on the same day

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Watson, Eastwood

Engineer Name: WJ

Date: May 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr White, Long Eaton, Nottingham

Engineer Name: PG

Date: September 2015

Comments/Suggestions:

Excellent service all round, thank you. Brilliant service you provided me with yet again, thanks.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Stevenson, Hucknall

Engineer Name: DD

Date: December 2016

Comments/Suggestions:

So pleased with Services from start to finish

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Deucher, Cotgrave

Engineer Name: JF

Date: May 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Jackson, Bestwood, Nottingham

Engineer Name: PR

Date: September 2015

Comments/Suggestions:

Absolutely superb service from start to finish. Sales man knew exactly what he was doing and the efficient engineer went above and beyond his duty . Will be recommending the company to everyone.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>