Name: Ms Glew, Wigston

Engineer Name: DN

Date: 22/7/15

Comments/Suggestions:

Brilliant - could not fault.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Liversidge, Nottingham

Engineer Name: MD

Date: March 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

He was excellent and he appeared to be training the young trainee very well.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>

Name: Mr Smith, Bramcote

Engineer Name: LK

Date: April 2017

Comments/Suggestions:

I would recommend your company.

1. Were the office staff polite and helpful? 5 4 3 2 1
2. Were your questions answered satisfactorily? 5 4 3 2 1
3. Was the appointment kept? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Did the engineer show identification and explain his/her intentions clearly? 5 4 3 2 1
5. Did the engineer display a caring and professional image? 5 4 3 2 1
6. Was the standard of work completed to your satisfaction? 5 4 3 2 1
View Review >>